CA9 Denies Petitioner’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees After Finding Government’s Position Was Substantially Justified

In a published order, the court denied a motion for attorneys’ fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), concluding that the government’s position was substantially justified and thus that the petitioner was not entitled to attorneys’ fees. (Meza-Vazquez v. Garland, 4/1/21) AILA Doc. No. 21041230

Let us work on your case

Or simply fill out the form and one of our attorneys will get back to you pretty shortly.

By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.

We're Here
To Assist You

Subscribe to Sethi & Mazaheri’s monthly newsletter and receive important immigration-related  updates.

Skip to content