The court held that, for purposes of removability for crimes involving moral turpitude (CIMT), the phrase “the date of admission” in INA §237(a)(2)(A)(i)(I) is ambiguous, and the BIA’s interpretation of the phrase in Matter of Alyazji was permissible. (Route v. Garland, 5/6/21) AILA Doc. No. 21051440
Or simply fill out the form and one of our attorneys will get back to you pretty shortly.
By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
Subscribe to Sethi & Mazaheri’s monthly newsletter and receive important immigration-related updates.
Subscribe to Sethi & Mazaheri’s monthly newsletter and receive important immigration-related updates.
by Prozco®